8 Comments
User's avatar
Teja Prakash K's avatar

The underlying fact behind this “simple” philosophy is to keep it intuitive to your target audience. Nice article Ami.

Expand full comment
Fanny Astikasari's avatar

Interesting though, in design - simple better ✨

Expand full comment
Ben Williams's avatar

Great post Ami.

I always thought the triangle was a paper aeroplane!

Expand full comment
Ami Vora's avatar

That's how I see it too!! I only recently realized that not everyone sees it the same way :)

Expand full comment
Pathik's avatar

Excellent article. The suggestion is subtle yet significant. I believe that many of these small enhancements greatly enhance user satisfaction.

Expand full comment
Bassi Renata's avatar

Interesting point of view!

In the example of WhatsApp’s interfaces, which blend elements of the operating system, how do you see the relationship with companies that are increasingly investing in their own design systems? Do you think this pursuit of visual identity could interfere with the simplicity of just adapting the product to the operating system?

Expand full comment
Ami Vora's avatar

I'm all for companies investing in their own design systems! (That was actually in an earlier draft of this post and I took it out for length :) )

Not everything needs to look like the operating system -- it just needs to be consistent with itself, because that builds a sense of predictability and control.

I think it's great to create new patterns, especially for new types of interactions or new feelings you want to elicit -- and then build consistency and muscle memory around them.

Expand full comment
Emmette C's avatar

"Simple products are immediately familiar and usable". +1

Expand full comment